Podcast with Paul Krugman: What can the 2025 elections tell us about 2026?
Deep Dives
Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:
-
Political realignment
12 min read
Morris discusses whether Trump achieved a 'realignment' with Latino and Gen Z voters in 2024 that is now evaporating. Understanding what political scientists mean by realignment and historical examples would help readers evaluate these claims about coalition shifts.
-
Opinion poll
13 min read
The article centers on Trump being 'the most unpopular president ever' and how approval ratings predict electoral outcomes. Understanding how approval ratings are measured, their historical ranges, and their predictive validity would deepen comprehension of the analysis.
Happy Saturday, readers,
I was delighted to sit down again with Paul Krugman this past Thursday to talk through the 2025 elections and what the results actually tell us. We cover the toplines — Democrats over-performed across Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and elsewhere — and then dig into the nitty gritty of which groups swung the most, and what it all means for 2026.
Here are a few selected topics from the conversation:
First, the election results confirmed what the polls have been telling us for months: Trump is deeply unpopular, his policy agenda is unpopular, and when voters are forced to choose between Trump and something else, they choose something else.
Second, the movement to Democrats was concentrated among the voters who powered Trump’s win in 2024: Latinos, Gen Z, and lower-income voters. Hispanic-heavy precincts shifted 60 points to the left. People who rank the economy as their top issue also broke decisively in the Democrats’ favor, a big reversal from 2024.
And why did the Democrats win so big? In one word: affordability. In two words: affordability and Trump. When the economy isn’t delivering for the average voter, Americans usually respond by voting out the party that holds the White House. Trump’s unpopular agenda on immigration and tariffs likely exacerbated the swing against him, explaining a larger-than-average defeat in VA and NJ.
We also get into why affordability — not hyper-optimizing issue positions or a radical shift to the center — is the path forward for Democrats. I look at the Strategist’s Fallacy in action, and urge people to think about politics beyond the 1-dimensional left-right ideological spectrum.
Also, polls underestimated Democrats (a mirror image of recent cycles) by about a normal amount. This is notable because polls have tended to underestimate Republicans recently. I explain what I think went wrong.
Finally, the results of Tuesday’s election predict a sizable Democratic edge in the 2026 House midterms, and give them a non-trivial shot at winning back the Senate (I give them a ~30-35% chance). Lots can change, of course, but the upshot for now is clear: Democrats are in the driver’s seat next year. On the core questions of economic stewardship and policy congruence with the average voter, Trump is falling short. Looking ahead, Republicans will face serious headings for Trump breaking his promises on prices.
A transcript of our interview follows. ...
This excerpt is provided for preview purposes. Full article content is available on the original publication.