← Back to Library

Correction, New York Times

Deep Dives

Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:

  • Jeffrey Epstein 17 min read

    The article centers on factual corrections about Epstein's legal history. The Wikipedia article provides comprehensive background on the complex legal proceedings, the controversial 2008 plea deal, and the full scope of allegations that the author is investigating.

  • Alexander Acosta 13 min read

    As the U.S. Attorney who approved Epstein's controversial plea deal in 2008, Acosta is essential context for understanding the 'worst-reported story of the era' that Taibbi is investigating. His role explains the institutional failures the article alludes to.

From the New York Times last week:

Mr. Epstein was first charged, on a single count of prostitution, in 2006, one year before the marina deal became final, although allegations had been swirling for years. The victim in the charge had been 14 years old. He pleaded guilty to that charge in 2008.

Jeffrey Epstein signed a non-prosecution agreement on September 24, 2007, pleading guilty to two charges. The first was for solicitation of a 19-year-old. The second, for “solicitation of minors to engage of prostitution,” involved a 17-year-old. He was never convicted of anything involving a 14-year-old. I wrote to reporter Debra Kamin, who helped restore my faith in journalism today by replying:

Thanks for writing. There were multiple victims whose testimony was taken into account under that single charge. The initial victim who led to the charge being filed was 14, but it gets complicated, which you’re right to point out. We’re going to tweak the sentence to make it a bit clearer. Thanks for reaching out.

The change as of now is “the victim in the charge had been as young as 14 years old,” which doesn’t feel quite right either, but still.

I mentioned before Thanksgiving that I’m working on a project that will make me a loathed figure. This is it, a review of the Epstein saga, which I’ve come to believe is the worst-reported story of the era. Kamin and one diligent USA Today reporter are so far the only journalists to respond out of dozens I’ve contacted about easily fixable problems. Still, there are far bigger issues, of the type Michael Tracey, Jay Beecher, and not many others have grappled with, that make this story incredible. It’s like Satan’s own game of Telephone! More on it later (we have a few irons in the fire here at Racket), but I wanted to give Kamin and the Times credit for the prompt reply, at a time when those are rare.

Read full article on Matt Taibbi's Racket →