Three Dilemmas of the Venezuela Crisis and One Proposal to Found the United Nations Anew
Deep Dives
Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:
-
2002 Venezuelan coup attempt
13 min read
The article directly references the 2002 attempt to remove Chavez as a historical parallel to the current crisis, making this essential context for understanding US-Venezuela relations and intervention patterns
-
Monroe Doctrine
12 min read
Explicitly mentioned in the article's key terms, this 19th-century policy underpins US claims to hemispheric influence and is central to understanding the ideological framework behind American interventions in Latin America
-
United Nations Security Council veto power
16 min read
The article's core argument about UN reform and constraining powerful nations requires understanding how veto power has historically blocked Security Council action, making this crucial context for the proposed solutions
The USA’s kidnapping of the President of Venezuela and his wife is a gross breach of international law and the United Nations charter. It presents three dilemmas to the world - not just the public authorities and diplomats of the world, but all of its citizens.
The standard we walk by is the standard we accept. The USA’s action cannot stand. The UN cannot stay the same. But how to change institutions amid an international crisis?
That question poses three dilemmas:
How to negotiate a peaceful resolution of the hostage situation?
How can the UN constrain, punish and rehabilitate the kidnapper, the USA?
How can the UN be reconstituted on sound principles so this never happens again?
I have a proposal to resolve the Venezuela Crisis, informed by the US Security Council discussion on 5 January, and then to reconstitute the United Nations? Inspired by ’s discussion of solutions, my modest proposal seeks to deliver the fundamental reform demanded by the Global Majority, governments and citizens.
This bonus Long Read is a New Year’s gift to you all. 🎁 Please upgrade your subscription to support my think pieces like this one that connect history and current global events.
As wrote earlier this week,
The orientation framework of the Western ruling strata has shifted to a war footing, a barbarous one at that, that knows no rules or laws. In this context, any Latin American country seeking sovereign policies is viewed through the lens of threat perception.
As the situation develops, we must hold on to our dignity and clarity. In the words of Mexican philosopher Fernando Buen Abad:
“Today, we are all anti-imperialists. May our cry for peace shake the deepest roots of anti-colonial dignity in our peoples. Enough of imperial plundering and slavery. WE ARE NO ONE’S COLONY.”
The First Dilemma: How to Negotiate a Peaceful Resolution of the Hostage Situation
The peoples of Latin America, and the world, face a dilemma common to every kidnap or hostage situation. Do you give into the ransom demands? How do you prevent the kidnappers killing the hostages? How do you negotiate with the outlaw to secure the safe release of the hostages? How do you capture the kidnappers and ensure they face justice?
In the USA, this situation might be resolved by shooting first and avoiding questions later. The local sheriff might then bluster at a press conference ...
This excerpt is provided for preview purposes. Full article content is available on the original publication.