Young White Supremacists Build a “Whites-Only” Town, But They Can’t Agree on Who Gets In
Deep Dives
Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:
-
Racial Integrity Act of 1924
14 min read
The article directly references this Virginia law and its 'one-drop rule' as a key example of how whiteness was legally constructed and arbitrarily defined, including the Pocahontas exception for elite families
-
1891 New Orleans lynchings
18 min read
The article mentions this mass lynching of eleven Italians as evidence of how Italian immigrants occupied an ambiguous racial status in America, a pivotal moment in understanding the social construction of whiteness
-
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach
12 min read
The article discusses how Blumenbach coined the term 'Caucasian' in 1795 based on aesthetic preferences about skulls, forming the pseudoscientific foundation of racial classification that persists today
Yesterday, Channel 5 released a documentary that quickly became one of the most discussed videos on the internet. It showcases a group of young white nationalists in rural Arkansas attempting to build what they call “Return to the Land,” a private community explicitly restricted to people of “European heritage.” The footage is uncomfortable and occasionally absurd. But buried in the cringe is a moment that cuts to the very heart of America’s oldest lie.
When the interviewer asks the community’s leader, Eric Orwoll, a seemingly straightforward question—"Who counts as white?"—he stumbles.
Can Greeks live there? “They’re European,” Orwoll replies. What about Central Asian Caucasians? He pauses, “They’re not European.” The interviewer discusses the idea that white people originated in the Caucasus, then asks about Italians from Staten Island who insist they’re “not white.” Orwoll begins explaining the “historical uses of the term white” before conceding that Italians and Irish were, for legal reasons, “always considered white.”
As the conversation continues, Orwoll discusses the application process and accidentally brings up another edge case. He admits that prospective members sometimes pass the interview only to mention, almost as an afterthought, “Oh yeah, but I have a Colombian wife.” That, he explains, is “kind of contrary to our values as an association.” The interviewer presses: what if the Colombian wife is 100% Spanish-blooded? Orwoll considers this for a moment. “Well, then it’s probably fine.”
“Probably fine”. The man building a whites-only ethnostate cannot tell you with certainty who qualifies. He’s making it up as he goes. And that, whether he realizes it or not, is exactly how race has always worked in America.
I’m fighting to document stories like this before they’re dismissed as fringe curiosities or normalized into silence, and I need your help.
With no corporate backing or wealthy sponsors, this work depends entirely on readers like you.
If everyone reading this became a paid subscriber, I could investigate the ideological through-lines between America’s past and its present full-time, but right now less than 3% of my followers are paid subscribers.
If you believe in journalism that traces the roots of today’s extremism to the soil they grew from, please consider a paid subscription today.
The Myth of the Caucasian
The term “Caucasian,” which Orwoll and his followers invoke with an almost religious reverence, has a rather embarrassing origin story. In 1795, a
...This excerpt is provided for preview purposes. Full article content is available on the original publication.

