Rebuffing Trump’s Ukraine Sellout, Social Media Fakery Exposed, and AI’s Stress Test for Society
Deep Dives
Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:
-
Munich Agreement
11 min read
The article explicitly draws parallels between the current Ukraine situation and Munich 1938. Understanding the historical details of how Britain and France pressured Czechoslovakia to cede the Sudetenland to Nazi Germany—and how that appeasement failed catastrophically—provides essential context for evaluating the comparison.
-
Internet Research Agency
13 min read
The article discusses coordinated fake social media accounts operating from Eastern Europe and other locations to influence Western politics. The Internet Research Agency is the most documented example of this phenomenon—a Russian organization that ran exactly these kinds of operations during the 2016 US election and beyond.
-
Finlandization
14 min read
The proposed 'peace plan' forcing Ukraine to demilitarize and accept Russian terms echoes Cold War-era Finlandization—when Finland maintained nominal independence but constrained its foreign policy to avoid provoking the Soviet Union. This historical concept illuminates what critics fear Ukraine is being pressured toward.
On today’s episode of the Critical Conditions podcast, Claire and I discussed the attempted Trumpy sellout of Ukraine (because it cannot be ignored) as well as the revelations about the mass production of fake X accounts and the warnings by an AI luminary that, well, we have a problem.
Join our growing community and unlock full access by upgrading to a Paid Subscription or Board Membership. And spread the word by inviting friends and colleagues! The sums are small. The significance is big.
The so-called “peace plan” that Trumpworld floated for Ukraine — and which the Europeans are presently attempting to rebuff politely — is so breathtakingly bad that one hardly knows where to begin. We tried anyway. The most obvious obscenity is structural: a deal made over Ukraine’s head, without informing America’s European partners, and in open adoption of the Kremlin’s talking points. It grants Russia the fruits of its aggression; it forces Ukraine to accept elections on a timetable dictated from abroad; it demands demilitarization at the very moment Europe needs the Ukrainian military as its forward line; and it places no reciprocal constraints on Russia, which remains a full dictatorship.
Claire described it, with justification, as a Russian rearmament plan. I noted that it carries eerie echoes of Munich: a small democracy forced to cede territory while great powers congratulate themselves for “restoring order.” The difference is that in 1938, the Americans could claim distance and ignorance. In 2025, we know exactly how appeasement works out.
Claire wondered why the American public is not in the streets (which I said I’m not surprised about). That absence is itself a data point—a sign of what a decade of Russian disinformation, political exhaustion, and digital fragmentation has done to the Western psyche. I said many Americans have internalized the message that Ukraine is a faraway country which matters little to their lives.
Beyond that, I argued, many are overwhelmed by the complexities of today. When a society loses confidence in its ability to understand the world, it becomes ripe for manipulation by those who offer simple answers and strong heroes.
Which brought us to the second topic: X’s (accidental?) disclosure of the true locations of masses of accounts. For years, enormous pro-MAGA accounts posing as down-home patriots — “MAGA Nation,” “Dark MAGA,” “IvankaNews” — were actually being run out of Eastern Europe, Thailand, Nigeria, and other curious locales. And ...
This excerpt is provided for preview purposes. Full article content is available on the original publication.