← Back to Library

How Metal Is the Past?

Deep Dives

Explore related topics with these Wikipedia articles, rewritten for enjoyable reading:

  • Wicker man 8 min read

    The article extensively discusses the uncertainty around whether Celts actually burned people in wicker men. The Wikipedia article on this specific practice would provide historical context on the evidence (and lack thereof) for this claimed Celtic ritual.

  • Elizabeth Báthory 16 min read

    Lady Bathory is mentioned multiple times as a key example of the article's central question about historical atrocities vs. propaganda. The full Wikipedia article would give readers the actual historical evidence about her alleged crimes and the political motivations behind her trial.

  • Druid 13 min read

    The article opens with an extended discussion of druids and their oral tradition, but readers would benefit from deeper context on what we actually know about this priestly class beyond Caesar's accounts, including archaeological evidence and later medieval Irish sources.

The druids, the educated philosopher class of the ancient Celts, didn’t write things down. They could have—some Celts were literate, writing in Gaulish with either the Greek or Roman alphabet—but they didn’t, as a matter of principle and custom. Well, really, we don’t know exactly why they didn’t, because they didn’t tell us, because not a single druid ever wrote anything down.

Julius Caesar, who was busy enslaving and murdering his way through Gaul (modern France), said that the druids didn’t write anything down because they felt that committing things to writing meant weakening one’s memory. It took 19 or 20 years of education to become a druid, leaving them with exhaustive knowledge of law, ceremony, conflict resolution, and the movement of celestial bodies.

They also probably learned how to sacrifice people, but historians are less sure about that. They probably sacrificed people, including burning them alive in giant statues built of straw or wicker, but we don’t know that for certain. Most of the contemporary writing about druids was written by their enemies who were looking for a moral excuse to conquer Gaul.

I have my own theory about why they never wrote anything down, though. One I might be wrong about. I think they didn’t write anything down because to commit laws and best practices to paper is to make them immutable. I’m certain that in the centuries or millennia that druids lived, their teachings changed. Though they were probably capable of feats of memory that would astound those of us who rely on writing, I can’t imagine that there weren’t subtle or radical changes between generations—and I suspect that was by design. I suspect that the druids weren’t afraid to let things change here and there and adapt to circumstance.

Some historians suspect, for example, that the Celts were moving away from human sacrifice already before Rome declared that they were evil barbarians who needed a good conquering.

It’s possible, as overwhelming legions flooded Gaul and Britain from the south, that the Celts started looking to their old ways out of desperation. We’ll probably never know. We don’t know much about what they were thinking, because they didn’t write things down.

We don’t know if they burned people alive in wicker men. We don’t know if the Irish cut the nipples off their king and then slit his throat on Samhain if he was doing a bad ...

Read full article on Birds Before the Storm →