More than a Safety Net – Value Created by Unemployment Benefits

Thank you for reading our work! Nominal News is an email newsletter read by over 4,000 readers that focuses on the application of economic research on current issues. Subscribe for free to stay-up-to-date with Nominal News directly in your inbox:

If you would like to support us in reaching our subscriber goal of 10,000 subscribers, please consider sharing this article and pressing the like❤️ button at top or bottom of this article!

Zero-sum thinking occurs when a person believes that an outcome from a particular interaction, especially an economic one, results in one person benefiting at the expense of another. This concept contrasts with positive-sum thinking, where interactions can create mutual benefits, adding value for all involved. Media outlets have recently covered this zero-sum phenomenon as it appears younger generations are more likely to perceive issues using the zero-sum framework. One common topic that is often viewed as zero-sum is immigration, where many believe locals are worse off when immigrants come, even though research, almost universally, shows immigration is positive-sum.

But another issue is also often viewed by many as zero-sum – unemployment insurance.

Unemployment Insurance – Value Creating

Unemployment insurance (“UI”) – a program that provides financial support to individuals who have lost their jobs and are actively seeking new employment – is viewed by many as an ‘unfair’ redistribution from those who work to those who aren’t working. After all, why should we pay people to not work? This is clearly a zero-sum situation. Or is it?

Theory of Unemployment Insurance

The purpose of UI is to smooth transition for workers between jobs. Getting laid off reduces income, which significantly affects individuals. UI aims to mitigate some of the financial strain by providing a portion of the lost income, called the replacement rate, while the newly unemployed person looks for a job.

A common concern of UI is the ‘moral hazard’ issue, where an unemployed person may prefer to collect UI rather than look for a job. Since claiming UI is usually limited to a specific amount of time (for example, in the US it is typically around 26 weeks, whereas in Denmark it can be up to 2 years), the concern is that the unemployed may delay finding a job or accepting a job offer.

However, one commonly overlooked aspect of UI is that it allows the unemployed person