Wikipedia Deep Dive

Concert of Europe

13 min read

The Gentleman's Agreement That Kept Europe From Burning

For nearly a century, Europe's most powerful nations agreed to stop killing each other. Not through binding treaties with ironclad enforcement mechanisms. Not through a supranational body with real authority. Through something far more fragile and, in retrospect, far more remarkable: a shared understanding that wars between great powers had become too expensive, too destructive, and too unpredictable to be worth fighting.

This was the Concert of Europe. It wasn't a formal alliance. It wasn't an organization with a headquarters or a secretary-general. It was closer to an ongoing conversation—sometimes cordial, often tense, occasionally breaking down entirely—between the handful of nations powerful enough to reshape the continent if they chose to.

And for the better part of a hundred years, it worked.

Born From Exhaustion

To understand why the Concert of Europe came into being, you have to understand what preceded it. From 1792 to 1815, Europe was almost continuously at war. First came the French Revolutionary Wars, then the Napoleonic Wars. Armies marched across the continent. Capitals fell. Monarchs were deposed, restored, deposed again. The map of Europe was redrawn repeatedly, sometimes within months.

By 1815, everyone was spent.

The great powers—Austria, Prussia, Russia, and the United Kingdom—had finally defeated Napoleon at Waterloo. They had no money left. Their populations were depleted. Their economies were shattered. The idea of another major war was not just unappealing; it was nearly unthinkable.

But exhaustion alone doesn't create lasting peace. The genius of the Concert of Europe was that it channeled this exhaustion into a system. The great powers gathered at the Congress of Vienna in 1814 and 1815, and they made a deal. Not a peace treaty in the traditional sense—something more ambitious. They agreed to consult each other before making major moves. They agreed to respect existing borders unless everyone signed off on changes. They agreed, in effect, to treat Europe as a shared project rather than a zero-sum competition.

The Balance of Power

The concept underlying the Concert was something diplomats call the "balance of power." The idea is elegantly simple: if no single nation becomes powerful enough to dominate all the others, then no nation will be tempted to try.

This wasn't a new idea. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant and Gottfried Leibniz had written about European federation. British foreign policy had long aimed to prevent any single continental power from achieving hegemony. What the Concert did was formalize this intuition into something approaching a system.

The boundaries established in 1815 could not be altered without the consent of the signatory powers. This was revolutionary. It meant that if Prussia wanted to annex a neighboring territory, or if Russia wanted to expand westward, they couldn't simply do it. They had to convince Austria, Britain, and France to go along. And since those powers had competing interests, major territorial changes became extraordinarily difficult to achieve.

The system was conservative by design. Its architects—men like the Austrian chancellor Klemens von Metternich, British foreign secretary Lord Castlereagh, and Tsar Alexander I of Russia—had seen what happened when revolutionary ideas swept across a continent. They had watched the French Revolution begin with calls for modest reforms and end with the guillotine, the Terror, and two decades of continental war. They wanted stability above all else, even at the cost of progress.

The Holy Alliance and the Quadruple Alliance

Within the broader Concert, two overlapping arrangements emerged. The first was the Holy Alliance, formed in September 1815 by Russia, Prussia, and Austria. Despite its grandiose name—the three monarchs pledged to govern according to Christian principles—it was in practice a mutual defense pact against liberalism and revolution. If revolutionaries rose up in one country, the others would help suppress them.

The British stayed out. Lord Castlereagh famously dismissed the Holy Alliance as "a piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense." Britain had a constitutional monarchy and a more liberal political tradition. It had no interest in pledging itself to police continental revolutions. The Ottoman Sultan also declined to sign, for the rather obvious reason that a Muslim empire joining a "Christian" alliance would be awkward for everyone involved. Pope Pius VII refused as well, judging the whole affair insufficiently Catholic.

The second arrangement was the Quadruple Alliance, signed in November 1815. This was a more traditional treaty binding Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia to uphold the terms of the peace settlement for twenty years. Crucially, it included a provision for the powers to meet regularly "for the purpose of consulting on their common interests." These meetings would become the Congress System—the operational heart of the Concert.

In 1818, France rejoined the club. The Bourbon monarchy had been restored, and the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle formally ended the occupation of France and admitted it to what became the Quintuple Alliance. Remarkably, just three years after Waterloo, the nation that had thrown Europe into chaos was sitting at the table as an equal partner.

Congresses and Crises

The Congress System worked through a series of high-stakes diplomatic meetings. When a crisis emerged, the great powers would gather to hash out a response. The system was ad hoc—there was no schedule, no permanent bureaucracy—but it was surprisingly effective.

Consider what happened in 1820. Liberal revolutionaries in Naples forced King Ferdinand I to accept a constitutional monarchy. To the conservative powers, this was alarming. Today we might see a constitutional monarchy as perfectly reasonable, even admirable. But to Metternich and his allies, it was the first step down a slippery slope that ended in guillotines and chaos.

The powers convened at Troppau, in what is now the Czech Republic. There they signed the Troppau Protocol, which stated that any country undergoing revolutionary change could be excluded from the alliance—and that the remaining powers were entitled to bring that country back into line, by force if necessary. The following year, at the Congress of Laibach (now Ljubljana), the powers authorized Austria to invade Naples and restore absolute monarchy.

This is where the cracks began to show.

Britain and France objected. They had no desire to become the police force for continental autocracies. The Congress of Verona in 1822 saw further tensions when Russia, Prussia, and Austria backed France's planned intervention in Spain to suppress a liberal revolution there, while Britain opposed it. Britain's foreign secretary, George Canning, withdrew from the Congress System entirely, declaring that England would chart its own course.

The First Phase: Holding the Line

Despite these disputes, the Concert held together in its essentials through the first half of the nineteenth century. This period is sometimes called the Age of Metternich, after the Austrian chancellor who dominated European diplomacy from 1815 until the Revolutions of 1848. Metternich was the architect of conservatism, the master of the diplomatic conference, the man who believed that order was more important than justice and stability more valuable than progress.

Under his influence, the Concert successfully suppressed or contained numerous revolutionary movements. Liberal uprisings in Italy, nationalist stirrings in Germany, democratic agitation in France—all were checked, dispersed, or co-opted. The map of Europe in 1848 looked remarkably similar to the map of 1815.

But the forces of nationalism and liberalism were merely contained, not defeated. In 1848, they erupted across the continent in what became known as the Springtime of Nations. Revolutions broke out in France, the German states, the Italian states, the Austrian Empire. Metternich himself was forced to flee Vienna in disguise.

For a moment, it seemed like the old order might collapse entirely.

It didn't. The revolutions of 1848 were ultimately suppressed, one by one. The Austrian Empire reasserted control over Hungary and northern Italy. The Prussian king rejected a liberal constitution offered by a German national assembly. France's Second Republic gave way to the Second Empire under Napoleon's nephew. By 1850, the conservative powers were back in charge.

But something had changed. The Concert could no longer pretend that nationalism didn't exist. And crucially, the powers began to recognize that some nationalist movements might be useful to their own interests.

The Crimean War and the Congress of Paris

The Crimean War of 1853 to 1856 was, in some ways, a failure of the Concert system. Russia and Turkey went to war over influence in the Balkans and access to Christian holy sites in Ottoman territory. Britain and France sided with Turkey, partly to check Russian expansion toward the Mediterranean. Austria, ostensibly Russia's ally, remained neutral but hostile. Prussia stayed out entirely.

This was exactly the kind of great-power war the Concert was supposed to prevent.

Yet the Congress of Paris in 1856, which ended the war, represented something remarkable. The powers gathered, as they had at Vienna four decades earlier, to negotiate a comprehensive settlement. They redrew borders. They established new rules for the Black Sea. And significantly, they admitted the Ottoman Empire to the Concert of Europe, formally recognizing it as a European power whose territory was guaranteed by the others.

Some scholars argue that the Congress of Paris was the high point of the Concert system—proof that even after a major war, the powers could come together to restore stability. Others see it as the moment when the original Concert effectively died, replaced by something more competitive and less cooperative.

The Wars of Unification

What the Concert could not survive was the remaking of the European map by nationalist movements backed by great-power armies.

Italy came first. The Kingdom of Sardinia, allied with France, fought Austria in 1859 and began absorbing the patchwork of Italian states. By 1861, a unified Kingdom of Italy existed—something that had not been seen since the fall of Rome.

Then came Germany. Prussia, under the guidance of chancellor Otto von Bismarck, fought Denmark in 1864, Austria in 1866, and France in 1870. Each war was short, decisive, and aimed at a specific territorial or political objective. By 1871, the German Empire was proclaimed in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles—a deliberate humiliation of France on its own soil.

The Concert had done nothing to prevent either unification. Austria, one of the original Concert powers, had been defeated and diminished. France, another original member, had been crushed and forced to cede Alsace-Lorraine. The map of Europe looked fundamentally different than it had in 1815.

The Second Phase: Bismarck's Concert

Bismarck understood that having reshaped Europe through war, Germany now needed peace to consolidate its gains. He set about reviving the Concert of Europe, but with Germany at its center.

The revitalized system of the 1870s and 1880s looked different from the original Concert. France was now a republic, seething with resentment over its defeat. Austria-Hungary (the Habsburg empire had reorganized itself after 1867) was weakened and increasingly dependent on German support. Italy, the newest great power, was often unreliable. Russia remained unpredictable.

Bismarck managed this volatile mix through a dizzying network of treaties and agreements. His goal was to keep France isolated while preventing any two other powers from combining against Germany. He hosted the Congress of Berlin in 1878, which redrew the Balkans after Russia's war with Turkey. He created the Triple Alliance linking Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. He maintained a separate agreement with Russia.

This second phase of the Concert facilitated something remarkable: the Scramble for Africa. Between the 1880s and 1914, the European powers carved up nearly the entire African continent among themselves, with minimal conflict between them. The Berlin Conference of 1884 to 1885 established rules for this partition, ensuring that colonial competition wouldn't lead to European war. From the perspective of the Concert's original goal—preventing wars between great powers—this was a success. From any other perspective, it was a catastrophe for the colonized peoples.

The Road to 1914

After Bismarck was dismissed in 1890, his careful balance began to unravel. Germany allowed its agreement with Russia to lapse. France and Russia, finding themselves both isolated, formed an alliance. Britain, alarmed by German naval expansion, gradually aligned with France and Russia in what became known as the Triple Entente.

Europe was now divided into two armed camps: the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy on one side, and the Triple Entente of France, Russia, and Britain on the other. The Concert's founding principle—that all great powers should consult together to manage crises—had been replaced by bloc politics.

The Balkans proved to be the Concert's undoing. The Ottoman Empire, the "sick man of Europe," was slowly losing its European territories to nationalist movements backed by various great powers. Russia supported Slavic nationalism. Austria-Hungary feared it. Germany backed Austria. France and Britain worried about Russian expansion but also about German dominance.

When Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo in June 1914, the crisis escalated with terrifying speed. Austria-Hungary, backed by Germany, issued an ultimatum to Serbia. Russia mobilized in support of Serbia. Germany declared war on Russia and France. Britain declared war on Germany. Within weeks, all the great powers were at war.

The Concert of Europe, which had maintained relative peace for a century, was over.

What the Concert Meant

The Concert of Europe was never perfect. It suppressed liberal and nationalist movements that we might today regard as legitimate. It enabled colonial expansion that brought immense suffering to much of the world. Its peace was always fragile, always contested, always threatened by the ambitions of one power or another.

But it was still remarkable. Between 1815 and 1914, there were no wars between the major European powers that lasted more than a few years or involved all of them at once. Compare this to the century before—the War of Spanish Succession, the Seven Years' War, the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars—and the contrast is stark.

The Concert's legacy lived on. The League of Nations, established after World War I, was explicitly modeled on the idea of great-power consultation to maintain peace. So was the United Nations, with its Security Council of permanent members. The Group of Seven, the Group of Twenty, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)—all these institutions carry echoes of that nineteenth-century experiment in managing an international system without a world government.

The Concert of Europe proved that great powers can choose to cooperate rather than compete. It also proved that such cooperation is inherently unstable, dependent on shared interests and mutual exhaustion and the memory of what happens when the system breaks down.

That memory faded. The statesmen of 1914 had not lived through the Napoleonic Wars. They did not remember the devastation, the exhaustion, the desperate longing for peace that had created the Concert in the first place. They had grown up in a world where great-power war was a theoretical possibility, not a lived experience.

They were about to be reminded.