Wikipedia Deep Dive

Dorothy Richardson

12 min read

The Woman Who Invented a New Way to Write

Before Virginia Woolf. Before James Joyce's Ulysses. Before Marcel Proust became synonymous with memory and consciousness. There was Dorothy Richardson, sitting in a rented room in Cornwall in 1912, inventing something that had never existed before: a novel written entirely from the inside of a woman's mind.

She hated what they called it. "Stream of consciousness"—that term now taught in every literature class—she dismissed as "that lamentably meaningless metaphor" and mockingly called it "The Shroud of Consciousness." But the name stuck, and her innovation changed fiction forever.

Here's the strange part: almost nobody reads her anymore.

A Victorian Childhood Bent Sideways

Dorothy Miller Richardson was born in 1873 in Abingdon, a small market town in Oxfordshire, England. She was the third of four daughters, which in Victorian England meant she was essentially invisible in terms of family expectations. But something shifted when her younger sister arrived. Her father Charles, apparently desperate for a son, began referring to Dorothy as his boy. She later attributed this to her own "boylike willfulness"—a quality that would serve her well.

The family lived in a mansion called Whitefield that Charles had built himself. They seemed prosperous. They weren't. The Richardsons moved to Worthing in 1880, then to Putney in London in 1883, each move a step down the social ladder as Charles's finances crumbled.

In London, Dorothy attended what was called a "progressive school"—influenced by the art critic and social thinker John Ruskin. The students were encouraged to think for themselves, which sounds unremarkable now but was genuinely radical for girls' education in the 1880s. She studied French, German, literature, logic, and psychology. She was being educated like a person who might actually use her mind.

Then, at seventeen, it all collapsed.

The Fall

Charles Richardson went bankrupt at the end of 1893. Dorothy had already been working for two years by then, first as a governess at a finishing school in Hanover, Germany—six months that would later become the opening of her life's work—and then teaching in England. In 1895, she left her teaching position to care for her mother, who was severely depressed.

Her mother killed herself that same year.

This is the kind of biographical detail that biographers love to connect to everything that follows. But what matters here is simpler and more brutal: at twenty-two, Dorothy Richardson was alone, without money, without family support, and without prospects. Victorian England offered very few paths forward for women in her position.

She chose the one that would make her a writer.

The Bloomsbury Attic

In 1896, Richardson moved into an attic room at 7 Endsleigh Street in Bloomsbury, London. She got a job as a receptionist, secretary, and general assistant at a dental surgery on Harley Street—the famous London street where all the doctors and specialists practiced.

This sounds like defeat. It wasn't.

Bloomsbury in the late 1890s was becoming the center of London's intellectual and artistic life. The Bloomsbury Group—Virginia Woolf, her sister Vanessa Bell, the economist John Maynard Keynes, the biographer Lytton Strachey—would later make the neighborhood synonymous with modernist experimentation. Richardson moved in those circles before they had a name. She associated with writers, radicals, and freethinkers.

She also began an affair with H. G. Wells.

Wells was already famous—The Time Machine, The War of the Worlds, The Invisible Man. He was also married to a former schoolmate of Richardson's, which gives you some sense of how small and incestuous these literary circles were. The affair led to a pregnancy, then a miscarriage, in 1907. Richardson left London for a while after that, spending time on a farm in Sussex run by a Quaker family.

Her interest in the Quakers—the Religious Society of Friends, with their emphasis on inner light and silent worship—led to two books published in 1914: The Quakers Past and Present and an anthology of writings by George Fox, the movement's founder. These were her first books, but not the ones that would matter.

Finding the Form

Richardson had been writing since 1902—articles, book reviews, short stories, poems. She translated eight books from French and German over her lifetime. Her essays ranged from Walt Whitman to Friedrich Nietzsche to French philosophy to British politics. A reviewer who read her work around 1912 urged her to try writing a novel.

She tried. And failed. And tried differently.

In the autumn of 1912, staying with friends in Cornwall, she began writing what would become Pointed Roofs. She later described her process as "attempting to produce a feminine equivalent of the current masculine realism," setting aside "a considerable mass of manuscript," and finally finding "a fresh pathway."

What was this pathway? Richardson wanted to capture consciousness directly—not what her character did or said, but how she perceived, felt, and thought, moment by moment. No authorial commentary. No external description. Just the mind moving through experience.

The character was Miriam Henderson. The experiences were Richardson's own, lightly fictionalized, covering her life from 1891 to 1915. The novel was Pilgrimage.

Thirteen Chapters of One Book

Here's where it gets confusing, and where Richardson's ambition becomes clear.

Pilgrimage is not a novel. It's also not thirteen novels. Richardson insisted it was one continuous work, published in installments over more than fifty years. Each "volume"—Pointed Roofs, Backwater, Honeycomb, and so on—she considered a chapter. The whole thing runs to around two thousand pages.

Pointed Roofs appeared in 1915. The reviewer May Sinclair, writing in The Egoist in 1918, borrowed a term from psychology to describe what Richardson was doing. The psychologist William James had used "stream of consciousness" in 1890 to describe the continuous flow of thoughts in the mind. Sinclair applied it to fiction for the first time.

Richardson had beaten everyone to it. Pointed Roofs was the first complete stream-of-consciousness novel published in English. Joyce's Ulysses wouldn't appear until 1922. Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway came in 1925. Proust's In Search of Lost Time was being published in French during these same years, but Richardson didn't read French well enough to have been influenced by it.

In 1934, Richardson wrote to Sylvia Beach—the Paris bookseller who had famously published Ulysses—noting that "Proust, James Joyce, Virginia Woolf & D.R. ... were all using 'the new method,' though very differently, simultaneously." She was right. They had all discovered, independently, that fiction could work like thought itself.

The Bohemian Marriage

In 1917, at forty-four, Richardson married Alan Odle. He was an artist, twenty-nine years old, tubercular, an alcoholic, and not expected to live long. He was part of a bohemian artistic circle that included Augustus John, the sculptor Jacob Epstein, and the painter and novelist Wyndham Lewis.

Odle was very thin, over six feet tall, with waist-length hair that he wound around the outside of his head and never cut. He also rarely cut his fingernails. He sounds like a character from a novel Richardson might have written.

Against all expectations, he stopped drinking and lived until 1948—thirty-one years of marriage. The couple developed a rhythm: winters in Cornwall, summers in London, from 1917 until 1939, when they settled permanently in Cornwall. Richardson supported them both with freelance journalism. Alan made almost no money from his art.

Between 1927 and 1933, she wrote twenty-three articles on film for Close Up, an avant-garde magazine focused on cinema as an art form. Her friend Bryher—the writer and film producer, and longtime partner of the poet H.D.—was involved with the magazine. Richardson was fascinated by film's potential to capture consciousness in ways that paralleled what she was doing in prose.

The Feminine Sentence

Richardson wasn't just inventing a technique. She was making an argument.

Her writing—unpunctuated in places, with sentences that ran on and on, breaking normal rules of grammar and structure—was deliberately feminine. She argued that "feminine prose, as Charles Dickens and James Joyce show themselves to be aware, should properly be unpunctuated, moving from point to point without formal obstruction."

Wait—Dickens and Joyce as examples of feminine prose? Richardson saw something in their work that she wanted to claim and extend: a fluidity, a resistance to the hard stops and rigid structures of what she considered masculine realism. Virginia Woolf recognized it in 1923, noting that Richardson "has invented, or, if she has not invented, developed and applied to her own uses, a sentence which we might call the psychological sentence of the feminine gender."

The critic John Cowper Powys, writing in 1931, went further. He argued that Richardson had created in Miriam Henderson "the first woman character who embodies the female quest for the essence of human experience." Other women novelists, he claimed—even George Eliot, even Virginia Woolf—had betrayed their deepest feminine instincts by using "the rationalistic methods of men." Only Richardson had found a truly feminine form.

This is a strange and somewhat troubling argument. It risks suggesting that women think differently from men in some essential, biological way—that there's a "female" kind of writing separate from a "male" kind. But Richardson was making a different point. She was saying that women's experiences had been systematically excluded from literature, and that capturing those experiences required breaking the forms that had been built to exclude them.

London as Character

Much of Pilgrimage is set in London, and the city isn't just backdrop. It's almost a character itself.

Richardson lived in her Bloomsbury attic and walked the streets endlessly. London, for Miriam Henderson, is what Powys called "an 'elastic' material space"—a place that expands to hold her experiences and explorations. The streets, cafés, restaurants, and clubs become extensions of her consciousness. She knows herself by knowing the city.

Powys compared Richardson to William Wordsworth—the great Romantic poet of nature and the Lake District. But instead of "the mystery of mountains and lakes," Richardson gave readers "the mystery of roof-tops and pavements." Urban experience, in her hands, became as worthy of poetic attention as any rural landscape.

The Long Forgetting

The first few volumes of Pilgrimage were received with enthusiasm and occasional confusion. Critics didn't quite know what to make of this new form, but they recognized something important was happening. Richardson continued publishing through the 1920s and early 1930s.

Then interest faded.

By 1928, the American poet and critic Conrad Aiken was already trying to explain why Richardson was "curiously little known." He offered several reasons: her "minute recording" tired readers who wanted action; she had chosen a woman's mind as her center of consciousness; her heroine lacked "charm."

That last reason is revealing. Miriam Henderson isn't charming. She isn't trying to please you. She's thinking, observing, experiencing—and Richardson refuses to make that process entertaining in conventional ways. This was the point. But it made her hard to read.

The 1938 Collected Edition of Pilgrimage—containing the first twelve "chapters"—received a disappointing critical reception and sold poorly. Richardson was sixty-five. She appears to have lost heart. The novelist Ford Madox Ford bewailed the "amazing phenomenon" of her "complete world neglect."

Clear Horizon and Dimple Hill were the last sections published during her active career. After 1938, she produced only three more chapters, published as "Work in Progress" in a literary journal in 1946. Alan Odle died in 1948. Richardson moved into a nursing home in Beckenham, a London suburb, in 1954.

She died there in 1957, largely forgotten.

The Final Chapter

The thirteenth and final book of Pilgrimage—March Moonlight—wasn't published until 1967, ten years after Richardson's death. It was unfinished. It included the material from "Work in Progress," but the novel that Richardson had spent most of her adult life writing remained incomplete.

The title Pilgrimage referred to two journeys: the artist's journey to self-realization, and the search for a unique creative form and expression. Richardson found that form. Whether she completed the journey is a question the unfinished ending leaves open.

Rediscovery and Neglect, Again

Literary reputations have tides.

Virago Press republished Pilgrimage in the late 1970s as part of its project to recover forgotten women writers. Scholars began paying attention again. The feminist movement found in Richardson a pioneer who had insisted, decades before it became a movement, that women's inner experiences were worthy subjects for serious literature.

But the recovery was temporary. By the 2010s, the critic Rebecca Bowler could write: "Given Richardson's importance to the development of the English novel, her subsequent neglect is extraordinary."

In 2015, a blue plaque was unveiled at Woburn Walk in Bloomsbury, where Richardson had lived in 1905 and 1906, directly opposite the Irish poet W. B. Yeats. The Arts and Humanities Research Council in England began supporting the Dorothy Richardson Scholarly Editions Project, aiming to publish a collected edition of her works and letters.

People are starting to read her again. Maybe.

Why She Matters

Here's what's strange about literary history: Richardson invented stream of consciousness in English, and Joyce and Woolf get the credit. Pointed Roofs came first, but Ulysses and Mrs. Dalloway are the books taught in schools and discussed in essays about modernism.

Part of this is quality—Joyce and Woolf are extraordinary writers, and their stream-of-consciousness novels are more varied, more ambitious in some ways, than Richardson's singular focus on Miriam Henderson. Part of it is sexism—Richardson was writing about a woman's experience, for readers who might care about women's experiences, and that has always been considered a smaller subject than the grand themes men write about.

But part of it is Richardson herself. She refused to make her work easy. She refused to provide the pleasures of plot, of charm, of resolution. She wanted to capture something true about how consciousness works, and she wouldn't compromise that vision for readability.

"The reader must be asked to do some of the work."

Most readers declined. The ones who accepted found something no other writer had given them: the inside of a mind, rendered with patience and precision, over two thousand pages and fifty years. A woman thinking her way through the world, without apology, without charm, without asking permission to be the center of her own story.

That was new. In 1915, it was revolutionary. In some ways, it still is.