Wikipedia Deep Dive

History of bitcoin

17 min read

The Ghost Who Built a Revolution

On January 3rd, 2009, someone using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto embedded a newspaper headline into the first block of a new digital currency. The headline read: "Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks." It came from The Times of London, published that same day. Was it simply a timestamp to prove the block couldn't have been mined earlier? Or was it something more pointed—a declaration of intent against a financial system that had just brought the global economy to its knees?

We still don't know. Satoshi Nakamoto vanished in 2011, leaving behind roughly one million bitcoins (worth tens of billions of dollars at various points), an open-source software project, and the most tantalizing mystery in modern technology.

But before we can understand the ghost, we need to understand what they built—and the decades of failed experiments that made Bitcoin possible.

The Cypherpunks' Dream

The idea of digital cash predates Bitcoin by nearly three decades. In the 1980s, a cryptographer named David Chaum proposed a system called ecash that would allow people to make anonymous digital payments. The concept was elegant: use mathematical tricks to create tokens that could be verified as genuine without revealing who spent them. Think of it like a digital version of physical cash—once you hand over a dollar bill, no one can trace that specific bill back to you.

Chaum even started a company called DigiCash to commercialize the technology. It failed. Banks weren't interested in anonymous payments. Why would they be? Tracking transactions is how they make money and comply with regulations.

But the dream persisted among a loose community of cryptographers, programmers, and privacy advocates who called themselves cypherpunks—a portmanteau of "cipher" and "cyberpunk." These weren't just technologists; they were idealists who believed strong cryptography could fundamentally reshape the balance of power between individuals and institutions.

In 1992, two computer scientists named Cynthia Dwork and Moni Naor proposed something crucial: what if solving difficult computational puzzles could have economic value? Their idea was originally meant to fight email spam—force senders to do a small amount of computational work before sending each message, making mass spam economically unfeasible.

Adam Back, a British cryptographer, independently developed this concept into a working system called Hashcash in 1997. The "work" was deliberately useless—computers would grind through calculations that served no purpose other than proving the work had been done. This sounds wasteful, but it created something previously impossible: a way to create digital scarcity without a central authority.

The Missing Pieces

Two more cypherpunks took these ideas further. Wei Dai proposed "b-money" and Nick Szabo proposed "bit gold," both in the late 1990s. They described systems where participants would create digital tokens by performing computational work, and these tokens could be transferred between people without any central institution.

But both proposals had a fatal flaw. They couldn't solve what computer scientists call the "Byzantine Generals Problem"—a colorful name for a serious challenge. Imagine several army generals surrounding a city, trying to coordinate an attack. They can only communicate by messenger. Some generals might be traitors sending false messages. How can the loyal generals reach consensus on a battle plan when they can't be sure which messages to trust?

In a digital payment system, this translates to: how do you prevent someone from spending the same digital token twice? If I send you a digital coin, what stops me from also sending that same coin to someone else a split second later? Traditional systems solve this with a central authority—a bank that keeps the authoritative record of who owns what. But the cypherpunks wanted to eliminate that central authority entirely.

Szabo proposed using a Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus mechanism, but his version was vulnerable to something called a Sybil attack—where an adversary creates thousands of fake identities to overwhelm the voting system. It's like stuffing a ballot box with fraudulent votes, except in a digital context where creating new identities costs nothing.

Interestingly, the National Security Agency published a white paper in 1996 titled "How To Make A Mint: The Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash." This paper, written twelve years before Bitcoin, explored many of the same concepts. Whether Satoshi ever read it remains unknown.

The Breakthrough

On August 18th, 2008, someone registered the domain name bitcoin.org. Ten weeks later, on Halloween, a paper appeared on a cryptography mailing list. Its author was listed as Satoshi Nakamoto—a name no one in the community recognized. The paper's title was modest: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System."

What made Bitcoin different from its predecessors? Satoshi solved the double-spending problem without requiring a central authority. The solution was elegant: instead of trusting any single entity, trust the network's collective computational power. Every ten minutes or so, all the recent transactions get bundled into a "block." Computers around the world race to solve a computational puzzle. Whoever solves it first gets to add their block to the chain and receives newly created bitcoins as a reward.

Here's the crucial insight: to cheat the system, you'd need to control more than half of all the computing power in the network. As the network grows, this becomes increasingly impractical. The blockchain—that permanent, public record of every transaction ever made—is secured not by any company or government, but by the sheer impossibility of outcomputing everyone else combined.

The genesis block—block number zero—was mined on January 3rd, 2009. Its reward was fifty bitcoins. And embedded within it was that enigmatic newspaper headline about bank bailouts.

The First Believers

The first person to run Bitcoin software besides Satoshi was a cryptographer named Hal Finney. He downloaded it the day it was released. On January 12th, 2009, Satoshi sent him ten bitcoins—the first Bitcoin transaction between two people ever recorded. Block 170 in the eternal ledger.

Finney was already a legend in cryptography circles. He had developed something called reusable proof of work, building on Adam Back's Hashcash. When he saw Satoshi's paper, he immediately grasped its significance. "It seemed like a very promising idea," he later wrote with characteristic understatement. Finney died in 2014 from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or ALS, having never revealed whether he knew Satoshi's true identity—if he knew it at all.

Wei Dai and Nick Szabo, the creators of b-money and bit gold, also became early supporters. There's a certain poignancy here: they had come so close to inventing Bitcoin themselves. Their ideas were clearly foundational. Some have speculated that one of them was Satoshi, but both have denied it.

In those early days, Satoshi mined constantly. Analysis of the blockchain suggests they accumulated roughly one million bitcoins—coins that have never moved, sitting dormant in wallets whose keys presumably only Satoshi knows. At Bitcoin's peak price, this stash was worth over sixty billion dollars. It remains untouched.

Who Was Satoshi Nakamoto?

The mystery of Satoshi's identity has spawned endless investigation and speculation. Journalists, researchers, and amateur sleuths have proposed dozens of candidates.

One analysis looked at the timestamps of Satoshi's five hundred-plus forum posts. The pattern was remarkably consistent: almost no posts between 5 AM and 11 AM Greenwich Mean Time. This held true even on weekends. If Satoshi was sleeping during those hours, they were likely in a time zone where that period corresponded to nighttime—which would match the Eastern United States (midnight to 6 AM) or possibly somewhere in the Caribbean or eastern South America.

But other evidence points to Britain. The newspaper headline in the genesis block came from The Times of London, not an American paper. And Satoshi's code contained British spellings—"colour" instead of "color," "optimise" instead of "optimize."

The New Yorker investigated two candidates: Michael Clear, a cryptography graduate student from Dublin, and Vili Lehdonvirta, a Finnish economist who studied virtual currencies. Both denied being Satoshi. Fast Company noticed that a patent application filed just three days before bitcoin.org was registered contained similar cryptographic concepts and even the same unusual phrase—"computationally impractical to reverse." The three inventors named on that patent all denied involvement.

In 2013, Ted Nelson (a computing pioneer who coined the term "hypertext" in the 1960s) speculated that Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki was Satoshi. Mochizuki is famous for claiming to have solved a major mathematical conjecture using techniques so novel that the mathematical community spent years trying to understand his proof. It seemed fitting that such a solitary genius might also have invented Bitcoin. But no evidence ever emerged.

The most dramatic candidate emerged in 2014 when Newsweek published a cover story claiming to have found Satoshi. The magazine pointed to a sixty-four-year-old Japanese-American engineer living in Temple City, California, whose birth name was actually Satoshi Nakamoto. The article was widely criticized for its methods, and the man denied any involvement with Bitcoin. He seemed bewildered by the attention.

In April 2011, Satoshi sent a message to another Bitcoin developer saying they had "moved on to other things." That was essentially the last anyone heard. The creator walked away from a project that would become worth hundreds of billions of dollars, from the fame and influence that could have been theirs, from one million bitcoins that could have made them one of the richest people on Earth.

Why? We may never know.

Two Pizzas for Ten Thousand Bitcoins

For its first year, Bitcoin was essentially worthless. A few dozen enthusiasts ran the software, mined coins, and traded them amongst themselves, but there was no market price because nobody was buying or selling for real money.

That changed on May 22nd, 2010. A programmer in Jacksonville, Florida named Laszlo Hanyecz posted on a Bitcoin forum offering ten thousand bitcoins to anyone who would order him two pizzas. A user in England named Jeremy Sturdivant took him up on the offer, placing an order with Papa John's for delivery to Hanyecz's home.

At the time, those ten thousand bitcoins were worth roughly forty dollars. A fair price for two pizzas. At Bitcoin's peak in 2021, those same bitcoins would have been worth almost seven hundred million dollars.

The crypto community now celebrates May 22nd as "Bitcoin Pizza Day." It's become a symbol of both Bitcoin's humble origins and the fortunes made and lost by those who bought or sold at the wrong time.

The First Crisis

In August 2010, someone found a catastrophic bug in the Bitcoin protocol. The software verified that transaction outputs never exceeded inputs—you can't send more bitcoin than you have. But it didn't handle very large numbers correctly. A transaction could be crafted where the outputs summed to more than two to the sixty-fourth power (that's a number with about nineteen digits). At that point, the number would "overflow"—wrap back around to a small number—and the verification would pass.

On August 15th, someone exploited this vulnerability. In a single transaction, they spent half a bitcoin to create over 184 billion new bitcoins out of thin air, sending them to two different addresses.

The community moved fast. Within hours, the bug was identified and fixed. But here came the controversial part: the developers asked miners to adopt the fix and essentially pretend the fraudulent transaction never happened. They "forked" the blockchain—created a new version of history where that transaction didn't exist.

This worked because enough miners agreed to it. The episode revealed something important about Bitcoin: despite its claims of decentralization, the network depends on social consensus among the people running it. If miners disagree about which version of history to follow, Bitcoin splits into competing versions. The one with more computing power behind it becomes "real" Bitcoin; the others become obscure spinoffs.

This was the only major security flaw ever successfully exploited in Bitcoin's history. The system's cryptographic foundations have proven remarkably robust—what vulnerabilities exist tend to be in the wallets, exchanges, and other services built on top of Bitcoin rather than in the protocol itself.

Into the Mainstream

By 2011, Bitcoin had grown enough to attract attention beyond the cypherpunk community. The Electronic Frontier Foundation—a nonprofit that defends civil liberties in the digital world—briefly accepted Bitcoin donations before pausing over legal uncertainty. WikiLeaks, blocked by traditional payment processors after publishing classified documents, began accepting Bitcoin. The technology was proving useful precisely because no bank or government could block transactions.

In January 2012, Bitcoin made its fictional debut on television. The CBS legal drama The Good Wife featured an episode called "Bitcoin for Dummies." Jim Cramer, the host of CNBC's Mad Money, played himself in a courtroom scene, testifying that he didn't consider Bitcoin a true currency: "There's no central bank to regulate it; it's digital and functions completely peer to peer."

That same year, the Bitcoin Foundation was launched to promote the technology. Its founders included Gavin Andresen (the developer Satoshi had handed the project to), Mark Karpelès (who ran the Mt. Gox exchange), and Charlie Shrem (who ran a Bitcoin payment service). Within a few years, Karpelès would be arrested after Mt. Gox collapsed, losing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of customer funds. Shrem would go to prison for money laundering. The foundation's early leadership reads like a cautionary tale about the Wild West period of cryptocurrency.

Growing Pains

March 2013 brought Bitcoin's first major technical crisis since the 2010 overflow bug. The blockchain split in two. For six hours, there were effectively two different Bitcoin networks running simultaneously, each with their own version of transaction history. If you received bitcoins during those six hours, you might have them on one chain but not the other.

The cause was prosaic: an upgrade to the Bitcoin software inadvertently changed how transactions were validated. Nodes running the old version and the new version started disagreeing about which blocks were valid. The community decided to roll back to the old version, essentially choosing to abandon the "new" chain.

The Mt. Gox exchange—at that time handling the majority of Bitcoin trading—temporarily halted deposits. The price dropped 23% before recovering. It was a reminder of how fragile decentralized consensus can be.

Also in 2013, American regulators began weighing in. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, declared that Americans who mine bitcoins and sell them for dollars are "Money Service Businesses" subject to registration and anti-money-laundering rules. This was significant: the government was treating Bitcoin as a real financial system, not a curiosity.

The price swings were spectacular. In April, Bitcoin crashed from $266 to $76 in a matter of hours when the major exchanges couldn't handle the trading volume, then bounced back to $160 by day's end. A law professor at the University of Chicago called it a "collective delusion." Others saw the volatility as growing pains for a genuinely new form of money.

Silk Road and the Dark Side

Bitcoin's first killer application wasn't buying pizzas or donating to WikiLeaks. It was buying drugs.

Silk Road was an online marketplace that operated on the dark web—a portion of the internet only accessible through special software that anonymizes users. The site, which launched in 2011, allowed people to buy illegal drugs, fake IDs, and other contraband with bitcoin. Because neither the site nor the payment system required real names, buyers and sellers could transact with relative anonymity.

The site was run by a man who called himself Dread Pirate Roberts, a reference to The Princess Bride. In October 2013, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Ross Ulbricht, a twenty-nine-year-old physics graduate, and accused him of being the Dread Pirate Roberts. They seized roughly 26,000 bitcoins from the Silk Road—the first time a government agency publicly reported seizing cryptocurrency as evidence.

The Silk Road case shaped public perception of Bitcoin for years. To many people, "Bitcoin" became synonymous with drug dealers and money launderers. But it also demonstrated something important: despite all the anonymity claims, Bitcoin transactions are actually fully public. Every transaction ever made is recorded in the blockchain forever. Sophisticated analysis can often trace transactions back to real identities. The FBI didn't need to break Bitcoin's cryptography to find Ulbricht; they used traditional detective work combined with blockchain analysis.

Government Recognition

By late 2013, governments around the world were grappling with how to classify this strange new thing. Was it money? Property? A commodity? A security? The answers had real consequences for taxation, regulation, and legality.

Germany's Finance Ministry classified bitcoins as a "unit of account"—a financial instrument—though not electronic money or legal currency. This meant German bitcoin transactions had specific tax implications.

In Texas, a federal judge ruled that bitcoins were "a currency or a form of money" and therefore securities subject to federal law. This came in a case about a Bitcoin-based Ponzi scheme—even the new technology couldn't escape the oldest financial fraud.

Thailand's financial authorities took a harder line, declaring that Bitcoin had no legal framework and was therefore effectively illegal to trade.

China's approach was more nuanced. In late 2013, the People's Bank of China banned financial institutions from handling Bitcoin, citing money-laundering concerns. But it didn't ban individual citizens from holding or trading it—a gray area that would persist for years.

The Physical World

On October 29th, 2013, the world's first Bitcoin ATM opened in a coffee shop in Vancouver, Canada. It allowed people to buy bitcoins with cash or sell bitcoins for cash, bridging the digital currency world with physical money. Within a few months, Bitcoin ATMs began appearing in cities around the world.

The Chinese internet giant Baidu briefly allowed customers to pay for security services with bitcoin. WordPress, the blogging platform, started accepting it. Payment processors like BitPay emerged to help ordinary businesses accept Bitcoin without needing to understand the technology.

But these were still edges of the economy. For most people, Bitcoin remained an exotic curiosity—something they'd heard of but never used. The true believers talked about Bitcoin replacing the dollar. Skeptics called it a bubble waiting to pop or, less charitably, a Ponzi scheme.

Both camps would have occasions to say "I told you so" in the years ahead.

The Legacy

Bitcoin spawned an entire industry. Other cryptocurrencies—Litecoin, Ethereum, and eventually thousands more—built on its ideas. The underlying blockchain technology attracted interest from banks, governments, and corporations who wanted the distributed ledger without the anonymous currency. "Blockchain, not Bitcoin" became a mantra in some corporate circles.

The science fiction writer Charles Stross captured something essential when he made Bitcoin the universal currency in his 2013 novel Neptune's Brood, set in a far future of interstellar civilization. He wrote that he'd chosen the name because "Bitcoin was obscure back then, and I figured had just enough name recognition to be a useful term for an interstellar currency." By the time the book was published, Bitcoin was no longer obscure at all.

Whether Bitcoin succeeds or fails as money, the problems it solved were real. The ability to transfer value across the internet without trusting any institution, the creation of digital scarcity, the use of consensus mechanisms to replace central authorities—these ideas will outlast any particular cryptocurrency.

And somewhere out there, perhaps, Satoshi Nakamoto watches what their creation has become. A million untouched bitcoins sit in wallets whose keys they alone possess. A timestamp in the genesis block marks a moment of financial crisis. A pseudonym protects an identity that the whole world wants to know.

The ghost built a revolution, and then walked away.