Wikipedia Deep Dive

Karl Marx

19 min read

In 1843, the Prussian government shut down a newspaper because the Russian Tsar complained about one of its articles. The editor who had written that offending critique of monarchy was a twenty-four-year-old journalist named Karl Marx. Within five years, he would write a pamphlet that began with the words "A spectre is haunting Europe" and ended with "Workers of the world, unite!" That pamphlet—The Communist Manifesto—would go on to reshape the political landscape of the twentieth century, inspiring revolutions that brought communist governments to power over a third of the world's population.

But before Marx became the most influential socialist thinker in history, he was something rather different: a romantic poet, a wine-country boy from the Rhineland, and a young man so devoted to philosophy that his father worried he would never make a practical living.

The Wine Merchant's Grandson

Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818, in Trier, an ancient city in what was then the Kingdom of Prussia (today it's in western Germany, near the Luxembourg border). Trier had been a Roman imperial capital—the massive Porta Nigra gate still stood from those days—and the region was famous for its Moselle wines. Marx's family owned several vineyards.

His background was more complicated than that pastoral image suggests. Marx's father, Heinrich, came from a long line of rabbis stretching back generations. His paternal family had supplied Trier's rabbis since 1723. But Heinrich had broken from that tradition entirely. He was the first in his line to receive a secular education, and he had converted from Judaism to Protestantism—not out of religious conviction, but professional necessity.

Here's what happened: When Prussia annexed the Rhineland in 1815, the new government revoked the legal rights that Jews had gained under earlier French rule. Heinrich Marx was a lawyer. To keep practicing law, he converted to the state church. It was a pragmatic choice, one that Heinrich—a man of the Enlightenment who admired Voltaire and Immanuel Kant—probably made without much spiritual anguish. He was largely non-religious anyway.

Karl and his siblings were all baptized Lutheran. His mother, Henriette Pressburg, came from a Dutch Jewish family with business connections that would prove surprisingly significant. Henriette's sister Sophie married a man named Lion Philips, a wealthy tobacco manufacturer. Lion and Sophie Philips were the great-grandparents of the founders of Philips Electronics—yes, that Philips, the Dutch multinational. When Karl Marx later found himself broke and exiled in London, he would repeatedly turn to the Philips family for loans.

A Young Radical in the Making

We don't know much about Marx's childhood. He was the third of nine children but became the eldest son when his brother Moritz died in 1819. His father educated him privately until age twelve, then sent him to the local high school.

That school turned out to be a hotbed of liberal ideas. The headmaster, Hugo Wyttenbach, was a friend of Heinrich Marx and had hired many teachers with progressive views. In 1832, police raided the school and found students distributing literature promoting political liberalism. The authorities viewed this as seditious and replaced several staff members. Young Karl was absorbing his first lessons in how governments respond to ideas they find threatening.

At seventeen, Marx headed to the University of Bonn to study philosophy and literature. His father had other ideas—law was more practical—so law it was, officially. But Marx was drawn to the life of the mind, and also to the life of student societies. He joined a drinking club called the Trier Tavern Club and briefly served as its co-president. He joined a poetry group that was monitored by police for its radical politics. He fought a duel with a member of another student organization. His grades, good at first, declined.

His father forced a transfer to the University of Berlin, which had a more serious academic reputation.

Before leaving for Berlin, something else happened. Marx got engaged.

Jenny von Westphalen

Jenny von Westphalen was four years older than Karl, educated, and came from the minor aristocracy. She had known Marx since childhood—his family and hers were friends—and she had actually broken off an engagement to a young aristocrat to be with him. This was scandalous. The match crossed lines of both religion and class. Karl was the son of a converted Jew from the professional middle class; Jenny was Protestant nobility.

But Jenny's father, Ludwig von Westphalen, was a liberal aristocrat who took a liking to the intense young man. Marx would later dedicate his doctoral thesis to him. Karl and Jenny would remain engaged for seven years before marrying in 1843—an unusually long engagement that reflected both their youth and their uncertain circumstances.

Philosophy and the Young Hegelians

In Berlin, Marx discovered the philosopher who would shape his entire intellectual life: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

Hegel had died just a few years earlier, in 1831, but his ideas dominated German philosophical circles. His system was notoriously complex—Hegel himself supposedly said on his deathbed that only one person had understood him, and even that person had gotten it wrong. But the core idea that captured Marx was Hegel's dialectic: the notion that history moves forward through conflict and contradiction, that opposing forces clash and produce something new, which then generates its own opposition, and so on.

For Hegel, this was primarily about ideas—the progress of human consciousness toward freedom. But a group of younger thinkers called the Young Hegelians began applying the dialectical method to more worldly targets: established society, politics, and especially religion. They were radicals who used Hegel's philosophical tools to critique the status quo.

Marx joined their circle. He became particularly close to Bruno Bauer, a theologian-turned-atheist, and the two of them even planned to start a journal called Atheistic Archives. (It never materialized.) They once took a trip from Berlin to Bonn where, according to one account, they scandalized respectable society by getting drunk, laughing in church, and galloping through the streets on donkeys.

Meanwhile, Marx was studying law, reading philosophy, learning English and Italian, translating Latin classics, and writing—poetry, a novel fragment, a play. None of this early creative writing was published during his lifetime. When you read his later theoretical works, it's worth remembering that the young Marx wanted to be a romantic poet.

The Philosopher's Doctorate

Marx completed his doctoral thesis in 1841, at age twenty-two. Its title gives you a sense of his interests: The Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature. Democritus and Epicurus were ancient Greek philosophers who both believed the universe was made of atoms—tiny indivisible particles—but they disagreed about whether those atoms moved according to strict necessity or had some element of randomness.

Why did this matter to Marx? Because it was really about free will and determinism. If everything happens by necessity, is there room for human freedom? Marx argued that theology must "yield to the superior wisdom of philosophy"—a daring claim that made conservative professors at the University of Berlin uncomfortable. He submitted his thesis instead to the University of Jena, which was more liberal, and received his doctorate there.

Marx had hoped for an academic career, but the Prussian government was cracking down on liberals and Young Hegelians. That path was closed.

The Radical Journalist

In 1842, Marx moved to Cologne and became a journalist for a radical newspaper called the Rheinische Zeitung (Rhineland News). He was twenty-four years old and full of opinions about everything: the conservative Prussian government, the liberals who he thought were too timid, the socialists who he thought were confused.

The newspaper was subject to government censorship. Every issue had to be approved by police before it could be printed. Marx described the situation bitterly: "Our newspaper has to be presented to the police to be sniffed at, and if the police nose smells anything un-Christian or un-Prussian, the newspaper is not allowed to appear."

Then came the article criticizing the Russian Tsar. Nicholas I personally requested that Prussia shut the paper down. The Prussian government complied in 1843.

Marx was out of a job—but not for long.

Paris and the Meeting with Engels

Later in 1843, Marx and his new bride Jenny moved to Paris. He had been offered the position of co-editor for a new publication called the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher (German-French Annals), which aimed to bring together French and German radicals.

Only one issue ever appeared. But in that single issue, Marx published an essay called "On the Jewish Question" that marked a turning point in his thinking. For the first time, he identified the working class—what he called the proletariat—as a revolutionary force. He was becoming a communist.

Paris in the 1840s was a center of radical thought and exile politics. Marx threw himself into study: the economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo, the French socialists Claude Henri de Saint-Simon and Charles Fourier, the history of France. He was searching for a way to understand how societies change, how economies work, and how revolution might happen.

Then, on August 28, 1844, Marx met Friedrich Engels at a café called the Régence.

Engels was the son of a wealthy German textile manufacturer with factories in Manchester, England. He had just published a book called The Condition of the Working Class in England, based on his firsthand observations of industrial workers' lives. Where Marx had been working out his theories abstractly, Engels had been walking through the slums of Manchester, seeing child laborers and families crammed into cellars, documenting the human cost of industrial capitalism.

The two men became inseparable collaborators and lifelong friends. Engels would support Marx financially for decades. Together they wrote The Holy Family (1845), a critique of their former ally Bruno Bauer. Together they would develop the theory that came to be known as Marxism.

Historical Materialism

What Marx and Engels developed was not just a political program but a way of understanding all of human history.

Here's the basic idea: Hegel had argued that history progresses through the conflict of ideas. Marx turned this upside down. He argued that ideas arise from material conditions—from how people produce the things they need to survive. The way a society organizes its economy (what Marx called the "mode of production") shapes everything else: its politics, its laws, its religion, its philosophy.

And every economic system contains internal contradictions that eventually tear it apart.

Think about feudalism, the system that dominated medieval Europe. Lords owned land; peasants worked it. But over centuries, trade and commerce grew. A new class emerged—merchants, bankers, manufacturers—who didn't fit the feudal categories. This bourgeoisie (the French word for the middle class, which Marx adopted) eventually became powerful enough to overthrow the old aristocratic order. That's what the French Revolution was about, in Marx's analysis: the bourgeoisie seizing power from the aristocracy.

But capitalism, the system the bourgeoisie created, has its own contradictions.

The Class Struggle

In Marx's analysis, capitalist society divides into two fundamental classes. There's the bourgeoisie: the people who own the means of production (factories, machines, land, capital). And there's the proletariat: the workers who own nothing but their ability to labor, which they must sell to the bourgeoisie for wages.

These two classes are locked in conflict because their interests are opposed. The bourgeoisie profits by paying workers less than the value those workers create. The workers, meanwhile, have every reason to demand higher wages, better conditions, shorter hours. This isn't a matter of individual greed or virtue—it's structural. The system pits them against each other.

Marx predicted that this conflict would intensify over time. Competition among capitalists would drive wages down and concentrate wealth in fewer hands. Periodic economic crises—recessions, depressions—would throw workers into misery. Eventually, Marx believed, the proletariat would develop what he called "class consciousness": an understanding of their shared situation and interests. They would organize. They would revolt. And they would replace capitalism with a new system.

The Communist Manifesto

In 1847, Marx and Engels joined an organization called the Communist League. Its members asked them to write a statement of principles.

The result, published in February 1848, was The Communist Manifesto.

It's a short document—you can read it in an hour—but its rhetoric is electrifying. "A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre of communism," it begins. It surveys all of human history as a story of class struggle: "Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman." It describes how the bourgeoisie revolutionized the world, tearing down old social bonds and traditions, constantly transforming production. "All that is solid melts into air."

And it predicts the bourgeoisie's downfall. The same forces that gave the capitalists their power—creating an industrial working class, concentrating workers in factories and cities—also create the conditions for their overthrow. "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers."

The Manifesto calls for revolution. It ends: "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of the world, unite!"

The timing was remarkable. In the same month the Manifesto was published, revolution broke out in France. Within weeks, uprisings spread across Europe—to the German states, Austria, Hungary, Italy. The conservative order that had dominated since Napoleon's defeat seemed to be crumbling.

Marx rushed back to Germany to participate. But by 1849, the revolutions had all been suppressed. Marx was expelled from Belgium, then from Prussia. He ended up in London, where he would spend the rest of his life.

Exile in London

The London years were difficult. Marx and his family lived in poverty, dependent on irregular journalism income and loans from Engels (who had returned to work in his father's Manchester business). Three of the Marx children died young, likely due at least in part to their impoverished living conditions.

Yet Marx kept working. He spent years in the reading room of the British Museum, researching economics. He analyzed the failed 1848 revolution in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, with its famous observation that history repeats itself "the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."

And he wrote his masterwork: Das Kapital (Capital).

Capital

The first volume of Capital appeared in 1867. Two more volumes, edited by Engels from Marx's notes, were published after his death. Together, they constitute Marx's comprehensive analysis of how capitalism works.

The central concept is what Marx calls "surplus value." Here's the idea: When a worker labors in a factory, they create value. But they're not paid the full value of what they produce—they're paid only their wages, which represent what it costs to keep them alive and working. The difference between the value created and the wages paid is surplus value, which the capitalist keeps as profit.

This isn't theft in any legal sense. The worker freely agreed to work for those wages. But Marx argues it reveals something important about the structure of capitalism: the system depends on extracting unpaid labor from workers. Profit comes from exploitation.

Marx also analyzes how capitalism tends toward concentration—bigger companies driving out smaller ones—and toward crisis. The internal contradictions he identifies include overproduction (capitalists produce more than workers can afford to buy) and the falling rate of profit (as machines replace workers, the source of surplus value shrinks). These contradictions, Marx believed, would eventually make the system collapse.

The First International

From 1864, Marx was involved in the International Workingmen's Association, later known as the First International. This was an organization that brought together trade unionists, socialists, and radicals from across Europe.

Within the International, Marx fought a long battle with the anarchists, led by the Russian revolutionary Mikhail Bakunin. Both groups wanted to overthrow capitalism. But they disagreed fundamentally about what should replace it. Marx believed the revolution required a transitional period—what later Marxists would call the "dictatorship of the proletariat"—during which the working class would hold state power to suppress counter-revolution. Bakunin and the anarchists wanted to abolish the state immediately. They feared that any workers' state would become just as oppressive as the bourgeois state it replaced.

Marx won the organizational battle—Bakunin was expelled from the International in 1872—but the conflict left the organization weakened. It dissolved shortly after.

The Long Shadow

Marx died on March 14, 1883, in London. He was sixty-four years old and stateless—he had never become a British citizen. He was buried in Highgate Cemetery, where his grave became a pilgrimage site for socialists from around the world. The massive tomb with its bust of Marx that stands there now was erected in 1954 by the Communist Party of Great Britain.

At his funeral, Engels delivered a eulogy: "Just as Darwin discovered the law of development of organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of development of human history."

The comparison to Darwin was apt in one sense: both men proposed theories that fundamentally changed how people understand the world. But Darwin's theory was a scientific hypothesis that could be tested against evidence. Marx's theory was something else—part social science, part philosophy, part revolutionary program. And its influence would be measured not in scientific citations but in political movements, revolutions, and regimes.

Marxism After Marx

In the decades after Marx's death, socialist parties across Europe adopted his ideas. The German Social Democratic Party became the largest party in Germany by 1912, formally committed to Marxism (though increasingly reformist in practice).

Then came 1917. In Russia, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the name of Marx's ideas. Lenin added his own interpretations and innovations—the theory of the revolutionary vanguard party, the analysis of imperialism—creating what came to be called Marxism-Leninism. The Soviet Union became the first state to call itself Marxist.

Over the following decades, communist parties took power in China, Cuba, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere. By the mid-twentieth century, roughly a third of humanity lived under governments that claimed Marx as their founding theorist.

These regimes varied enormously. The Soviet Union under Stalin and China under Mao became brutal totalitarian states responsible for millions of deaths. Other communist governments were less murderous but still authoritarian. The gap between Marx's vision of a "free association of producers" and the reality of police states, gulags, and political purges became a central problem for anyone trying to evaluate his legacy.

The Question of Marx's Responsibility

Did Marx's ideas lead inevitably to Stalinism? This remains one of the most contested questions in political thought.

Critics point to elements in Marx's own writings that seem to authorize authoritarianism: the "dictatorship of the proletariat," the dismissal of "bourgeois" freedoms like free speech and property rights, the apocalyptic certainty that history was moving toward a predetermined end. When you believe you possess scientific knowledge of history's direction, it becomes easier to justify crushing those who stand in the way.

Defenders argue that Marx envisioned something very different from Soviet totalitarianism. He wrote relatively little about what communist society would actually look like, preferring to focus on analyzing capitalism. What he did write emphasized human freedom and the "withering away" of the state—the opposite of a powerful bureaucratic dictatorship. The horrors of Stalinism, in this view, were distortions or betrayals of Marx's actual ideas.

The truth may be that Marx's ideas were genuinely ambiguous on these questions, and that different interpreters could plausibly develop them in very different directions.

Marx's Legacy Today

The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. China remains nominally communist but has embraced market capitalism in practice. The revolutionary wave that Marx predicted would sweep away capitalism never materialized in the advanced industrial countries.

Yet Marx's influence persists in unexpected ways.

In economics, heterodox schools of thought continue to draw on his analysis of labor, capital, and crisis. The 2008 financial crisis sparked renewed interest in his writings on capitalism's inherent instability. When people talk about how automation might eliminate jobs, or how wealth concentrates in fewer hands, or how economic power translates into political power, they're often echoing Marxist themes—whether they know it or not.

In sociology, Marx is considered one of the founding figures of the discipline. His insistence that we analyze societies in terms of class conflict, economic structures, and material interests became part of the standard toolkit of social science.

In philosophy, his critique of ideology—the idea that what people believe is shaped by their social and economic position—influenced generations of thinkers.

And in politics, while revolutionary communism has faded, socialist and social-democratic movements around the world still draw inspiration from Marx's critique of capitalism, even when they reject his prescriptions for revolution.

The Wine Merchant's Grandson, Revisited

What do we make of Karl Marx?

He was a man of enormous intellectual ambition who genuinely believed he had discovered the laws of historical development. He was a devoted husband and father who watched three of his children die in poverty. He was a difficult personality—combative, grudge-holding, terrible with money—who maintained a lifelong friendship with Engels based on genuine intellectual partnership and mutual loyalty. He was a journalist, an organizer, an exile, a pamphleteer, and a theorist who spent decades in the British Museum trying to understand how capitalism worked.

His ideas changed the world, though not in the way he expected. He predicted revolution in England and Germany; it came instead in Russia and China, countries that barely figured in his analysis. He predicted that capitalism would be replaced by communism; instead, the regimes that claimed his name mostly collapsed or transformed into something very different. He predicted that the proletariat would become a universal class representing all humanity; instead, workers in wealthy countries largely became comfortable consumers with little interest in revolution.

Yet his questions refuse to go away. Why does wealth concentrate? Why do economic crises keep recurring? Who really benefits from the way our economy is organized? How do economic power and political power relate? What would a truly free and equal society look like?

These remain live questions, contested and urgent. And anyone who engages seriously with them will eventually have to reckon with the wine merchant's grandson from Trier who spent his life trying to answer them.