Total fertility rate
Based on Wikipedia: Total fertility rate
The Quiet Revolution in Human Reproduction
South Korea's women are, on average, having 0.7 children each. That's not per year—that's over their entire lifetimes. In Niger, the number is 6.1. Between those two figures lies one of the most dramatic transformations in human history, one that will reshape economies, redraw borders of political power, and fundamentally alter what it means to grow old in the coming century.
The total fertility rate—the average number of children a woman would have if she experienced current birth rates throughout her reproductive years—has become the single most important demographic statistic of our time. The United Nations projects that by 2084, the world's population will peak and begin declining. We are, quite possibly, witnessing the beginning of the end of population growth as a feature of human civilization.
What This Number Actually Measures
The total fertility rate is a snapshot, not a prophecy. Demographers calculate it by looking at how many babies women of different ages are having right now, then adding up those rates across the entire reproductive span, typically from fifteen to forty-nine years old. If you took all the birth rates for each age group in 2024 and imagined a hypothetical woman living through each of those years, experiencing each of those rates, the total fertility rate tells you how many children she would end up having.
This method has an important quirk. It captures current behavior, not lifetime outcomes. If women start having children later in life—a trend that has accelerated dramatically in wealthy countries—the total fertility rate can drop even when women's eventual family sizes haven't changed at all. Demographers call this the "tempo effect," and it can make fertility rates appear lower than they truly are.
The Czech Republic and Spain experienced this in the 1990s. Women weren't necessarily planning to have fewer children—they were just having them later. The total fertility rate plunged, causing alarm, then partially recovered as those delayed births eventually happened.
The Magic Number: 2.1
Replacement-level fertility is the rate at which a population exactly replaces itself, with each generation being the same size as the one before. In developed countries with low child mortality, this number is approximately 2.1 children per woman. The extra tenth accounts for children who die before reaching reproductive age and for the slightly higher number of boys born compared to girls.
In countries with higher mortality rates, particularly among children, the replacement level can climb as high as 3.5. More children must be born to ensure enough survive to continue the population.
What happens below replacement level? The mathematics are unforgiving. A population that maintains a total fertility rate of 2.0 will shrink over time, absent immigration. Not quickly—demographic changes unfold across generations—but inexorably.
The World Before the Crash
For most of human history, fertility rates were extraordinarily high by modern standards. From antiquity through the beginning of the Industrial Revolution around 1800, women typically had between 4.5 and 7.5 children. This wasn't because people wanted enormous families—it was because so many children died young that having many was the only way to ensure some survived to adulthood.
Even as recently as the 1960s, the global average remained around five children per woman. Then something remarkable happened. In just sixty years, that number has fallen to 2.3—less than half what it was. No previous century saw anything like this transformation. The demographic transition, as scholars call it, has compressed what once took centuries into a single human lifetime.
The Lowest-Low Club
Demographers have a term for fertility rates at or below 1.3: "lowest-low fertility." Once considered a temporary aberration of countries undergoing rapid social change, it has become a permanent feature of much of East Asia and Europe.
The numbers are startling. As of 2024, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine all have total fertility rates at or below 1.0—meaning women are having, on average, one child or fewer. Argentina, Belarus, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Estonia, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, and Uruguay hover at 1.2 or below.
The record low belongs to a district in northeastern China. The Xiangyang district of Jiamusi city recorded a total fertility rate of 0.41 in 2000. To put this in perspective, if that rate persisted, each generation would be less than one-fifth the size of the one before.
Outside Asia, the lowest rate ever recorded was 0.80 in East Germany in 1994. This extreme figure resulted partly from the social upheaval following German reunification. Older women had already completed their families under the communist system, while younger women postponed childbearing as they adapted to a new economic reality. The result was a temporary fertility crater that, while alarming in the statistics, didn't necessarily reflect a permanent change in how many children German women would ultimately have.
Why Rich Countries Have Fewer Children
The relationship between wealth and fertility is one of the most robust patterns in demography. As countries develop, their fertility rates fall. This correlation holds so strongly that the Indian economist Karan Singh captured it memorably at a 1974 United Nations population conference: "Development is the best contraceptive."
The mechanisms are numerous and reinforcing. In wealthy countries, children are expensive. They require education, healthcare, activities, and attention. They rarely contribute economically to the household until they're adults, and even then, they typically establish independent lives rather than supporting their parents.
In poorer countries, the calculus is different. Children can work alongside their parents from a young age. They provide security in old age in places without pension systems or social safety nets. Having many children is both economically rational and socially expected.
Education, particularly for women, consistently reduces fertility. Women with more schooling have children later, have fewer of them, and are more likely to pursue careers that compete for time with childrearing. Urbanization pulls in the same direction—cities offer both opportunities that compete with parenthood and constraints like small apartments that make large families impractical.
Access to contraception matters enormously. Where women can reliably prevent pregnancy, they do. Where they cannot, fertility rates remain high almost regardless of other factors.
The Strange Case of Religious Countries
One might expect religiosity to correlate strongly with fertility—and within countries, it often does. Religious families tend to have more children than secular ones. But across countries, the relationship is messier.
Nordic countries and France are among the least religious in Europe yet maintain relatively higher fertility rates. Meanwhile, deeply religious countries like Cyprus, Greece, Poland, Portugal, and Spain have some of Europe's lowest fertility. Something about how these societies are organized—perhaps their social policies, perhaps their economic structures, perhaps their housing markets—matters more than their piety.
Population Momentum: Why Change Is Slow
Demographic changes move like supertankers, not speedboats. Even after fertility drops below replacement level, population can continue growing for generations. This phenomenon, called population momentum, occurs because a previous period of high fertility created large cohorts of young people who are now having children of their own.
Think of it this way: if your grandparents' generation had four children each, your parents' generation is large. Even if your parents only have two children each—below replacement—there are so many of them that the total number of babies still exceeds the number of people dying. Only when those large generations age through and die will the population begin actually shrinking.
This lag effect can persist for fifty years or more. It's why demographers project that even as fertility rates fall globally, world population will continue rising until the 2080s.
The Doubling Time Problem
At the opposite extreme, high fertility compounds with frightening speed. A population maintaining a total fertility rate of 3.8 would double roughly every thirty-two years, assuming deaths and emigration don't offset births. In three generations—less than a century—such a population would grow eightfold.
This mathematical reality explains why population growth so alarmed demographers and policymakers in the twentieth century. When much of the developing world had fertility rates of five, six, or seven, the math pointed toward resource exhaustion and civilizational collapse. That those predictions haven't come true owes much to the dramatic fertility declines that followed.
When Governments Intervene
Throughout history, governments have tried to control fertility, often with disastrous results.
The most infamous pronatalist policy—meaning a policy designed to increase births—was Romania's between 1967 and 1989 under communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu. The regime outlawed abortion and contraception. It mandated routine pregnancy tests for women. It taxed childlessness and legally discriminated against people without children.
The results were catastrophic. Births did increase, but so did abandonment. Romanian orphanages swelled with children whose parents couldn't care for them. When those institutions closed in the 1990s, the children ended up on the streets. Over nine thousand women died from illegal abortions during this period.
China pursued the opposite goal. Concerned about population growth, the government implemented the one-child policy from 1978 to 2015. Enforcement methods included forced abortions and sterilizations—human rights abuses that scarred a generation. The policy achieved its demographic goals but created a gender imbalance as families selected for sons and a rapidly aging society with too few young workers to support retirees.
India's 1975 forced sterilization campaign during the national emergency remains a cautionary tale of governmental overreach. Millions were sterilized, often under coercion. The program is now remembered as both a failure and an abuse of power that set back voluntary family planning efforts for years.
The Net Reproduction Rate: A Different Lens
The total fertility rate counts all children. The net reproduction rate counts only daughters—specifically, how many daughters a woman would have over her lifetime given current fertility and mortality rates. When this number equals exactly one, each generation of women precisely replaces itself.
This measure becomes especially relevant in countries with severe gender imbalance. In parts of China and India, sex-selective abortion has produced abnormally high numbers of male births. The total fertility rate might look sustainable, but if those children are disproportionately male, the next generation of mothers will be smaller than current rates suggest.
What Comes Next
The United Nations projects that global fertility will continue falling throughout this century, reaching 1.8 by 2100—well below replacement level. If this projection holds, world population will peak in 2084 and begin a long decline.
For wealthy countries already at lowest-low fertility, the challenges are immediate: aging populations, shrinking workforces, strained pension systems, and questions about who will care for the elderly when there are too few young people to do so. Japan, often cited as the leading edge of this demographic transformation, offers a preview—a society simultaneously prosperous and aging, innovative and constrained.
For developing countries still in demographic transition, the coming decades offer what economists call a "demographic dividend"—a period when the working-age population is large relative to both the young and the old. Countries that invest wisely during this window can accelerate their development. Those that don't may face the burdens of aging populations before they've built the wealth to sustain them.
The baby bust isn't a crisis in the traditional sense—there's no immediate catastrophe, no single moment of reckoning. It's more like a slow tide going out, revealing a landscape we're only beginning to understand. The world our grandchildren inherit will be older, smaller, and organized around very different assumptions about growth, work, and care.
What remains uncertain is whether societies will adapt to this new reality or cling to models built for a younger, expanding world. The numbers are already in motion. The question now is what we do with them.
--- The file needs to be written to `/Users/bedwards/hex-index/docs/wikipedia/total-fertility-rate/index.html`. I need write permission to create this file.