Wikipedia Deep Dive

Federal Reserve Act

12 min read

The Secret Meeting That Changed American Money Forever

In November 1910, a group of the most powerful bankers in America boarded a private train car in New Jersey. Their destination was Jekyll Island, a secluded retreat off the coast of Georgia. They traveled under assumed names. Porters were told to address them only by first name. The meeting was so secret that participants denied it had occurred for decades afterward.

What emerged from that island gathering would eventually become the blueprint for the Federal Reserve—the institution that today controls America's money supply, sets interest rates, and serves as the lender of last resort when financial panic strikes.

But the path from that clandestine meeting to the law President Woodrow Wilson signed on December 23, 1913, was anything but straightforward. It required navigating a century of American distrust toward centralized banking power, balancing the interests of Wall Street against rural populists, and threading a needle between private control and government oversight.

America's Long Distrust of Central Banks

To understand why creating the Federal Reserve was so difficult, you need to understand that America had tried this before—twice—and both times it ended badly.

The story begins with Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, two founders who agreed on almost nothing regarding economic policy. Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary, believed the young republic desperately needed a strong central bank. The country had emerged from the Revolutionary War burdened with debt and operating with a fragmented, chaotic financial system. Hamilton argued that a central bank could bring order to the monetary system, manage government finances, and provide credit to both public and private sectors.

Jefferson saw things differently. He was deeply suspicious that a central bank would undermine democracy itself. He and his Southern allies worried that such an institution would serve the commercial interests of Northern merchants and bankers at the expense of Southern agricultural interests, who relied on local banks for credit.

Hamilton won the first round. The First Bank of the United States opened in 1791 with a twenty-year charter. The federal government became its largest shareholder, though curiously it was not permitted to participate in managing the institution. The bank accepted deposits, issued banknotes, made short-term loans to the government, and—crucially—could regulate state-chartered banks to prevent them from printing too much paper money.

It worked reasonably well. But the philosophical objections never went away.

When the charter came up for renewal in 1811, it failed by a single vote in both the House and the Senate. The Jeffersonians had won.

The Second Try and Andrew Jackson's Revenge

The victory was short-lived. The War of 1812 created exactly the kind of financial chaos Hamilton had warned about. With no central bank to coordinate the monetary system, individual banks expanded the money supply recklessly, sparking high inflation. By 1816, the case for a second national bank had become undeniable.

The Second Bank of the United States received its charter that year. But almost immediately, it stumbled. During the Panic of 1819—one of America's first major economic depressions—the bank was blamed for overextending credit during a land speculation boom. When it subsequently tightened credit policies, it made itself even more unpopular.

The bank found enemies everywhere. Western and Southern state-chartered banks resented its power. Constitutional questions about whether Congress even had the authority to create such an institution persisted. And then came Andrew Jackson.

Jackson despised the Second Bank with a passion that bordered on obsession. He believed it favored a small economic and political elite at the expense of ordinary Americans. He made destroying it a central project of his presidency. When the bank's charter expired in 1836, Jackson made sure it was not renewed. The institution limped on as a private bank for a few years before finally liquidating in 1841.

For the next seventy-seven years, America would operate without a central bank.

The Panic That Changed Everything

The absence of a central bank didn't mean the absence of financial crises. If anything, they became more frequent and more severe. America experienced major panics in 1857, 1873, 1893, and most dramatically in 1907.

The Panic of 1907 was a turning point. When a failed attempt to corner the copper market triggered a run on banks and trust companies, there was no institution with the power to step in and provide emergency liquidity. The stock market fell by nearly fifty percent from its peak. Banks across the country failed.

In the end, the crisis was resolved not by any government institution but by one man: J.P. Morgan. The legendary financier personally organized a consortium of bankers to pledge their own money to shore up the banking system. He locked the presidents of New York's major banks in his library and refused to let them leave until they agreed to his rescue plan.

It worked. But it left Americans deeply uneasy. The fate of the entire financial system had depended on the goodwill and deep pockets of a single private citizen. What would happen next time if there was no J.P. Morgan to save the day?

Even people who had long opposed central banking began to reconsider. Perhaps the country needed some kind of institution that could provide emergency credit during panics—a "lender of last resort" that could step in when private resources proved inadequate.

The Aldrich Plan and Its Enemies

Congress responded to the Panic of 1907 by creating the National Monetary Commission, tasked with studying banking reform. The commission was chaired by Senator Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island, a conservative Republican closely allied with the banking establishment. His daughter had married John D. Rockefeller Jr., making Aldrich part of the family network of America's wealthiest financiers.

It was Aldrich who organized the secret Jekyll Island meeting in 1910. Along with representatives from J.P. Morgan's bank, the Rockefeller-controlled National City Bank, and several other major financial institutions, he drafted what became known as the Aldrich Plan.

The plan called for a "National Reserve Association" with fifteen regional branches and forty-six directors—most of them bankers. This association would print money, make emergency loans to member banks, and serve as the government's fiscal agent. It was, in essence, a central bank controlled by the banking industry itself.

Rural and Western states reacted with immediate hostility. They saw the plan as a power grab by what they called the "Money Trust"—the interlocking network of Wall Street banks they believed already wielded too much influence over the American economy.

Their suspicions weren't unfounded. From May 1912 through January 1913, a congressional subcommittee chaired by Representative Arsène Pujo of Louisiana held hearings investigating the Money Trust. The testimony revealed an extraordinary concentration of financial power. A small group of bankers sat on each other's boards, controlled access to capital, and could effectively decide which businesses would thrive and which would fail.

The Aldrich Plan was dead on arrival.

Wilson's Middle Path

The 1912 election transformed the political landscape. Democrats won the White House and both chambers of Congress. Their party platform explicitly opposed the Aldrich Plan and called for banking reform that would protect the public from domination by the Money Trust.

The new president, Woodrow Wilson, faced a delicate balancing act. He agreed that the country needed a central banking system. But he also understood that any plan too friendly to Wall Street would face fierce opposition from progressives in his own party, led by the charismatic William Jennings Bryan.

Bryan had run for president three times on a platform of easy money and hostility to Eastern banking interests. His supporters believed that the gold standard and tight money policies systematically favored creditors over debtors, the wealthy over working people. Any banking reform that lacked their support was doomed.

Wilson turned to Louis Brandeis, the brilliant lawyer who would later become a Supreme Court justice, for advice on how to thread the needle. Brandeis helped him see a path forward: the banking system must be "public not private," Wilson declared, "vested in the government itself so that the banks must be the instruments, not the masters, of business."

The Compromise Takes Shape

Democratic Congressman Carter Glass of Virginia and Senator Robert Owen of Oklahoma crafted the legislation that would become the Federal Reserve Act. Their compromise preserved much of the Aldrich Plan's structure while adding crucial elements of government control.

Private banks would own and largely control twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, scattered across the country to diminish Wall Street's influence. But a new Federal Reserve Board, filled entirely with presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate, would oversee the entire system.

The twelve regional banks were a masterstroke of political design. By distributing power geographically, the system addressed long-standing concerns that any central bank would inevitably become a tool of Eastern financial interests. Each region would have its own Federal Reserve Bank, responsive to local economic conditions.

Wilson personally lobbied Bryan's supporters, convincing them that the new Federal Reserve notes would be "obligations of the government"—not private banknotes issued by a banker-controlled institution. The currency would be elastic, able to expand and contract with the economy's needs, preventing the kind of money shortages that had turned previous panics into catastrophes.

The bill passed the House in September 1913. The Senate proved more difficult. Bank president Frank Vanderlip pushed an amendment that would have given private banks greater control over the central banking system. Wilson worked furiously to hold his Democratic coalition together, and in the end he succeeded. The Senate approved the Federal Reserve Act by a vote of fifty-four to thirty-four.

Wilson signed it into law on December 23, 1913, just two days before Christmas.

What the Federal Reserve Actually Does

The system Wilson signed into existence has evolved considerably over the past century, but its basic structure remains intact.

At its core, the Federal Reserve serves three main functions. First, it manages the money supply—the total amount of currency and credit circulating in the economy. Too little money leads to deflation, falling prices, and economic contraction. Too much money leads to inflation, rising prices, and the erosion of purchasing power. Finding the right balance is one of the most consequential decisions any government makes.

Second, the Federal Reserve provides oversight and regulation of banks. This includes setting reserve requirements—the amount of money banks must keep on hand rather than lending out—and examining banks to ensure they're operating safely and soundly.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, the Federal Reserve serves as the lender of last resort. When banks face a sudden surge of withdrawals they cannot meet, they can turn to the Federal Reserve's "discount window" for emergency loans. This function exists precisely to prevent the kind of cascading bank failures that characterized the panics of the nineteenth century.

Nationally chartered banks—banks chartered by the federal government rather than individual states—are required to be members of the Federal Reserve System. They must purchase stock in their regional Federal Reserve Bank and maintain reserves there. State-chartered banks can choose whether to join.

Evolution and Crisis

The Federal Reserve Act has been amended many times since 1913. One of the most significant changes came in 1917, just months after America entered World War One. To finance the expected two billion dollar annual cost of the war, Congress loosened the rules governing how much gold had to back each dollar in circulation. This allowed the money supply to more than double in just six months, from four hundred sixty-five million dollars to over one billion two hundred million. Inflation followed.

Another crucial amendment came in 1927, when Congress quietly extended the Federal Reserve's charter from twenty years to indefinite. The original law had given the Fed the same kind of limited charter that had doomed the First and Second Banks of the United States. But by 1927, the system had become too essential to risk in a rechartering fight.

The wisdom of that amendment became apparent just six years later. By 1933, America was in the depths of the Great Depression. Public sentiment toward the Federal Reserve and the banking system had deteriorated catastrophically. Banks were failing by the thousands. President Franklin Roosevelt had just taken office with a mandate for dramatic change.

Had the Federal Reserve's charter been up for renewal in 1933, it might well have been abolished. Instead, it was reformed. The Banking Act of 1933 created the Federal Open Market Committee, or FOMC, which oversees the Federal Reserve's open market operations—the buying and selling of government securities that is now the primary tool for implementing monetary policy.

Later amendments added what is now known as the Federal Reserve's "dual mandate": to pursue maximum employment and stable prices while also maintaining moderate long-term interest rates. These sometimes competing goals—keeping unemployment low often means accepting somewhat higher inflation, and vice versa—continue to define the central debates over monetary policy today.

The Legacy of Jekyll Island

More than a century after those bankers gathered secretly on a Georgia island, the institution they helped design remains one of the most powerful in the world. The Federal Reserve's decisions about interest rates ripple through every corner of the global economy, affecting everything from mortgage rates to stock prices to the value of the dollar.

The debates that shaped the Federal Reserve Act—private control versus public accountability, Wall Street's interests versus Main Street's, centralized power versus regional autonomy—have never fully been resolved. They recur with every financial crisis, every surge of inflation, every recession.

Perhaps that's as it should be. The men who wrote the Federal Reserve Act understood they were creating something unprecedented: an institution with immense power over the economic lives of every American. They built in tensions and checks precisely because they couldn't fully anticipate how that power would be used.

The system they created was neither purely public nor purely private, neither fully centralized nor completely decentralized. It was a compromise forged from a century of American ambivalence about concentrated financial power. That ambivalence persists. And so does the Federal Reserve.